Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Leodis Randle v. Eric Higgins, et al
as 24-1711
Plaintiff:
Leodis Randle
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Does, Agents, Dyer, 12th Street Police Officer, Major and others
Dyer v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, SI
as 2:2023cv04161
Plaintiff:
Curtis Dyer
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company, SI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Klapp et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01485
Plaintiff:
Adam Klapp, Charles Kinnard, Darrius Pearson and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Randle v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Leodis Randle
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Does Agents, Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Risenhoover v. King et al
as 2:2023cv02006
Plaintiff:
Polly Risenhoover
Defendant:
Zachary King, Joshua Winford, City of Dyer, Arkansas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dyer v. Crowley Logistics, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv03246
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE R DYER and Michelle R. Dyer
Defendant:
CROWLEY LOGISTICS, INC., CROWLEY LINER SERVICES, INC., MAG TRANSPORTATION LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Scott v. Yakimovicz et al
as 4:2022cv00739
Plaintiff:
Brandon D Scott
Defendant:
Yakimovicz, Arender, Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Yakimovicz et al
as 4:2022cv00741
Plaintiff:
Brandon D Scott and Kevin Williams
Defendant:
Yakimovicz, Arender, Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Yakimovicz et al
as 4:2022cv00740
Plaintiff:
Christopher Eugene Williams
Defendant:
Yakimovicz, Arender, Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LeClaire v. Dyer et al
as 2:2022cv02131
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael LeClaire
Defendant:
Deputy Richard Dyer and Deputy Brandon Chancey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
