Cases 1 - 10 of 138
Stephen Plunkett v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1639
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, Collette Peters, John P. Yates, Warden and others
Mobley v. Garrett et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mobley
Defendant:
Garrett, Bledsoe, Edge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickle v. Minnesota Association of Townships et al
as 0:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Pickle
Defendant:
Minnesota Association of Townships, Jeffrey S. Krueger, Steven M. Fenske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edge v. USA
as 0:2023cv03828
Petitioner:
Anthony Doane Edge
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Smith et al v. Western Edge Electric, Inc.
as 0:2023cv02783
Plaintiff:
Joel Smith, Heather Grazzini, Joe Fowler and others
Defendant:
Western Edge Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Joshua Whiteley v. C. Edge
as 23-2701
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joshua Whiteley
Defendant / Appellee:
C. Edge, Acting Warden, FCI Forrest City, Arkansas (originally named as John P. Yates)
Plunkett v. Garland et al
as 2:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Collette Peters, John P Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Horn v. Yates
as 2:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Sean P Van Horn
Defendant:
John P Yates and C Edge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bolden v. Doe
as 2:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Rahiem Bolden
Defendant:
Doe and C Edge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Dumas v. Does
as 2:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Mencho Dumas
Defendant:
Does and C Edge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
