Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Nelson v. Minneapolis Public Housing Authority
as 0:2022cv00697
Plaintiff:
Warren F. Nelson
Defendant:
Minneapolis Public Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Nelson v. Wright Medical Technology Inc
as 4:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
John F Nelson
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability
Nelson v. Aldi Inc. (Minnesota) et al
as 0:2020cv01321
Plaintiff:
Warren F. Nelson
Defendant:
Aldi Inc. (Minnesota)
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Aldi Inc. (Minnesota) d/b/a Aldi Store # 67 et al.
3Rd Party Defendant:
JBM Patrol & Protection Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. AEON Management, LLC et al
as 0:2018cv02436
Defendant:
Shanon Ployhart, Colin Burkholder, EPG Security Group and others
Plaintiff:
Warren F. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Charles P. Nelson, et al v. American Family Mutual Ins.
as 17-2665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles P. Nelson and Darlene F. Nelson, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Nelson v. Lake Superior College
as 0:2017cv01056
Plaintiff:
Warren F. Nelson
Defendant:
Lake Superior College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson et al v. Byrne et al
as 1:2016cv00042
Defendant:
Byrne, Edward Byrne, Radcrete Pacific Pty Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Nelson, Curtis F. Nelson and Ted E. Amsbaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Nelson et al v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 0:2013cv00607
Plaintiff:
Charles P. Nelson and Darlene F. Nelson
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv02347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
