Cases 1 - 10 of 212
Watts v. Hess et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jerod Watts
Defendant:
Jessica Hess, Shane Russell, Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stanley v. Precythe et al
as 2:2023cv04223
Plaintiff:
Dairian Eugene Stanley
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Travis Terry, Doris Falkenrath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McIntosh v. Gallion et al
as 0:2023cv03149
Plaintiff:
Patrick Randell McIntosh
Defendant:
Lt. Gallion, Captain Hess, Warden Jared Rardin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friday v. Peters et al
as 0:2023cv02870
Plaintiff:
Cleone Cecelia Friday
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Andre Matevousian, Michael Segal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weflen v. Hess Bakken Investments II, LLC
as 1:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Dennis Weflen
Defendant:
Hess Bakken Investments II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Albert Millsapp v. MO DOC Employees, et al
as 23-2982
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Albert Millsapp
Defendant / Appellee:
Missouri Department of Corrections Employees, Lindsey Hill, Brittany Odom, Corrections Officer and others
Jennewein et al v. United Specialty Contractors, LLC
as 4:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
Brian Jennewein, Mark Savage, John Walker Jr. and others
Defendant:
United Specialty Contractors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Roe v. Precythe et al
as 2:2023cv04129
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Doris Falkenrath, Jay Cassady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Hess v. United States
as 23-2257
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daniel Hess, also known as Jason Hess
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
