Cases 1 - 10 of 1,169
Abdikarim v. Groth et al
as 3:2024cv00169
Defendant:
Officer Michael DiPalma, Officer Alek Groth, Jill Kristen Smithson and others
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. Jackson County Missouri Sheriffs Deputies et al
as 4:2024cv00555
Defendant:
Jackson County Missouri Circuit Court, Dean Whipple, Judge Vernon E Scoville, III and others
Plaintiff:
Darrel R Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Abdikarim v. Groth et al
as 3:2024cv00154
Defendant:
Officer Jack Krueger, Officer Alek Groth, Officer Michael DiPalma and others
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. I.R.S.
as 8:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Jack Brown
Defendant:
I.R.S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2024cv00309
Defendant:
State of Nebraska
Plaintiff:
Jack Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greenlee v. North American Automotive Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
AnaiCheri Greenlee
Defendant:
Weber Chevrolet, Napleton Mid Rivers Imports, Inc., Napleton Enterprises, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gehm v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02909
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jack Frederick Gehm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Hardy v. Barker
as 1:2024cv01046
Defendant:
Judge Jack Barker
Plaintiff:
Raymond Douglas Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victor Perkins v. Dr. Jack Daniels, et al
as 24-2448
Defendant:
Dr. Jack Daniels, Chief Psychiatrist and Dr. Dionne Hart, Staff Psychiatrist
Plaintiff:
Victor Perkins
Brown v. National Accounts System of Omaha
as 8:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Jack Brown
Defendant:
National Accounts System of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
