Cases 1 - 10 of 3,994
Byers v. May et al
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Kevin Byers
Defendant:
Brendan May, John Does and Augusta, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Wilbon et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01705
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wilbon and Tana Wilbon
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Weber v. P. Officer Olsen et al
as 4:2024cv04091
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Weber
Defendant:
P. Officer Olsen, Amanda, Mat Theophilus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Huckabee et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Sarah Huckabee, Board of Correction, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks v. Nichols et al
as 4:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Sparks
Defendant:
Kevin Nichols and Nelson Brothers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
McGee v. Anderson et al
as 4:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Kevin Douglas McGee
Defendant:
CEO Donna Anderson, Valerie Huhn and Debra Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillip Pond v. Daniel Mosteller, et al
as 24-1972
Petitioner:
Phillip W. Pond
Respondent:
Daniel C. Mosteller, United States Marshals, Kevin Thom and others
Hutchison v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2024cv02054
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hutchison
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Weeks v. Arkansas Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Weeks
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Corrections, Thomas W Hurst, Brandon Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Babcock v. Reyes et al
as 5:2024cv05026
Petitioner:
Kevin Babcock
Respondent:
Alejandro Reyes and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
