Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Titus v. Omega Center
as 6:2024cv06056
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Titus v. Scarface, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus, ADC #168523
Defendant:
Scarface, Movie, Al Pacino, Director of Scarface, Keef Coff Group and others
Ware v. Keefe Commissary
as 4:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Andre T. Ware
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Double Tree Parking Garage et al
as 4:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Keefe Group Inc
as 4:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Keefe Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v Scarface et al
as 4:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Scarface, Al Pacino, Keef Coff Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips et al v. Keefe Commissary Services et al
as 4:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Clint Phillips, III and Kenneth L. Phillips
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Services, St. Louis County and McArther Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Coborn's Incorporated et al
as 0:2023cv02382
Plaintiff:
James Lee Jones
Defendant:
Coborn's Incorporated and Irving John Keefe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
James Raper, Jr. v. Rose Braley
as 23-2663
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James M. Raper, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Rose Braley, Head of Commissary, Keefe, Southwest Arkansas Community Correction Center
Cody Howard v. Keefe Company, et al
as 23-1477
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cody S. Howard
Defendant / Appellee:
Keefe Company, Commissary Provider and Does, Pulaski County Commissary Personnel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
