Cases 1 - 10 of 141
Davis et al v. Ennen Eye Center et al
as 2:2024cv02067
Plaintiff:
Jerry K Davis and Susan L. Davis
Defendant:
Ennen Eye Center, Dr. Parker Pratt and Dr. Randy Ennen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Rosie Davis v. William Franks
as 24-1927
Plaintiff:
Rosie L. Davis
Defendant:
William Dale Franks
Intervenor:
Arkansas Department of Education, The and Arkansas State Board of Education, The
Davis v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01328
Plaintiff:
Janice L. Davis
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Hughes v. Richards et al
as 4:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Brian RaMon Hughes
Defendant:
Haynes, Caffey, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Richards et al
as 5:2024cv05069
Plaintiff:
Brian Ramon Hughes
Defendant:
Sergeant Marilyn Richards, Corporal Haynes, Corporal Caffey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Mr. Bult's Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Patricia Williams, Ivy Johnson and Tanya Mayes
Defendant:
Mr. Bult's Inc. doing business as Mr. Bult's MBI and Joshua L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Poindexter v. Wilkins et al
as 4:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Eddie Poindexter
Defendant:
A Wilkins, L Davis, A Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shirley v. Johnson et al
as 5:2023cv05079
Plaintiff:
Steven Shane Shirley
Defendant:
Warden Johnson, Lieutenant Latasha L. Davis and Corporal Gracey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shirley v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Steven Shane Shirley
Defendant:
Johnson, Latasha L Davis and Gracey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
