Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Coleman v. Wagner et al
as 6:2023cv02019
Plaintiff:
James Michael Coleman
Defendant:
Michelle M Wagner, Brian Williams, Erin Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00744
Plaintiff:
Hersheko Mau Deetta Berry
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Maus et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 4:2018cv00081
Plaintiff:
Cory Maus and Christy Maus
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mau v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2016cv04377
Plaintiff:
Darius K. Mau
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mau et al v. Twin City Fire Insurance Co.
as 1:2016cv00325
Plaintiff:
Robert Mau and Eagle Well Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Twin City Fire Insurance Co.
Counter_claimant:
Twin City Fire Insurance Co.
Counter_defendant:
Eagle Well Services, Inc. and Robert Mau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Desjarlais v. Pierce County, ND et al
as 4:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
Larry J. Desjarlais
Defendant:
Pierce County, ND , Matthew Lunde , Mary Richard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyer v. Haeg et al
as 0:2015cv02564
Plaintiff:
Harley Dean Meyer
Defendant:
Thomas Haeg, Stephen C. Aldrich, Virginia Ekola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonnie Hasenwinkel v. Mosaic, et al
as 14-3786
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bonnie Hasenwinkel
Defendant - Appellee:
Mosaic, Kelly Thompson, Janet Fisher and others
Hasenwinkel v. Mosaic et al
as 4:2013cv00202
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Hasenwinkel
Defendant:
Mosaic, Kelly Thompson, Janet Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Steven Maus v. Brian Toder, et al
as 10-1349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Steven M. Maus
Defendant - Appellee:
Brian N. Toder and Chestnut & Cambronne, P.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
