Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Tashonda Troupe v. St. Louis County, Missouri, et al
as 24-1036
Plaintiff:
Tashonda Troupe, individually and, on behalf of Lamar Catchings, deceased
Defendant:
Anthony Young, in his individual capacity, St. Louis County, Missouri, Julia Murphy, in her indivdual and offical capacities and others
Troupe v. St. Louis County, Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv01269
Plaintiff:
Tashonda Troupe and Jordan Atwater
Defendant:
Terrianna Byas, John Jane Doe, St. Louis County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Alicea et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02482
Plaintiff:
Israel Alicea, Leroy Ahnee, Richard Cabbil and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Brewer v. Maness et al
as 1:2023cv01071
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Dion Brewer
Defendant:
Jerry Maness, Gean Seiger, Leroy Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brewer v. Maness et al
as 4:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Dion Brewer
Defendant:
Jerry Maness, Gean Seiger, Leroy Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Rodrick Mitchell
as 22-3616
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Rodrick Mitchell
Vann v. Johnson et al
as 4:2022cv04077
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Vann, Jr
Defendant:
Judge Kirk Johnson, Prosecutor Connie Mitchell and Prosecutor Stephanie Potter-Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammons v. Precythe et al
as 5:2022cv06047
Plaintiff:
Quinton Hammons
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe and Rodrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00936
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Pitts
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson, James Shipman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sears v. Barrows et al
as 0:2020cv01083
Defendant:
Gene Hill, Rodrick Barrows and City of Isanti, the
Plaintiff:
Michael Sears
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
