Cases 1 - 10 of 256
Armstrong v. St. Louis County Sheriff's Dept.
as 0:2024cv02185
Plaintiff:
Seth A. Armstrong
Defendant:
St. Louis County Sheriff's Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01676
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Traylor v. Minnesota Dept of Corrections et al
as 0:2024cv01275
Plaintiff:
Rayco DelShaune Traylor
Defendant:
Minnesota Dept of Corrections, Binkley, Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Snyder et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
Brad Snyder, Sheila Robertson, Jacob White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Seth Peterson
Defendant:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forman v. South Dakota DCI et al
as 4:2023cv04208
Plaintiff:
Michael Brian Forman
Defendant:
South Dakota DCI, City of Brookings, Seth Bonnema and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Smith v. Payne
as 4:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Seth Bradley Smith
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henderson v. USA
as 3:2023cv05096
Petitioner:
Seth Eugene Henderson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
