Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Mumin v. Case Manager Carroll et al
as 8:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Dukhan Mumin
Defendant:
Case Manager Carroll, Shaun Settles, Case Worker Moeshoeshoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Npimnee v. Settles
as 8:2024cv00130
Petitioner:
Hope T. Npimnee
Respondent:
Shaun Settles
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hopper v. Chancey et al
as 2:2024cv02040
Plaintiff:
Danny Hopper
Defendant:
Deputy Brandon Chancey, Former Prosecutor Rinda Baker, Prosecutor Kevin Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy et al v. DMEC Capital Services, LLC
as 4:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Amy Kennedy and Daniel Otto
Defendant:
DMEC Capital Services, LLC doing business as Settle Our Debt
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Smith v. Settles et al
as 4:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
James Elwood Smith
Defendant:
Barbara Holliman, Jared Byers, Jeffery Jerry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Settles et al
as 6:2021cv06154
Plaintiff:
James Elwood Smith
Defendant:
Sgt. Paulas Settles, Barbara A. Holliman, Warden Jared Byers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Settles et al
as 6:2021cv06152
Plaintiff:
James Elwood Smith
Defendant:
Sergeant Paula Settles, Barbara Holliman, Warden Jared Byers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henson v. John Doe Doctor et al
as 2:2021cv02124
Plaintiff:
Joey Lee Henson
Defendant:
John Doe Doctor, Public Defender Ryan Norris, Prosecuting Attorney Rinda Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Settles et al v. Vaughn
as 8:2021cv00181
Plaintiff:
Elijah Kamara and Meshelle Settles
Defendant:
Jeffrey Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Settles v. Etherly et al
as 2:2021cv00036
Plaintiff:
Jarvius Dantee Settles
Defendant:
Mallard, Marcus Etherly and Beale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
