Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Michael Criddle v. Jackson County Sheriff Office, et al
as 24-1476
Plaintiff:
Michael Christopher Criddle
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriff Office, Ruth Ann Dickerson, David James and others
White v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Scotty Lee White
Defendant:
Paul Hopkins, Ashley Lepold, Dane R. Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Criddle v. Jackson County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Michael Christopher Criddle
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriff Office, Ruth Ann Dickerson, David James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sinclair v. Davis et al
as 3:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Dominique Sinclair
Defendant:
Tyrone Davis, Francis Washington, Scotty Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
United States v. Scotty Old Horse
as 23-2952
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Scotty Old Horse
McMahan v. Hodges et al
as 4:2023cv00705
Plaintiff:
John G McMahan
Defendant:
Scotty L Hodges, Zachary McAnally and Benton Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Tucker v. Parker et al
as 6:2023cv06003
Plaintiff:
Steven Lakeen Tucker
Defendant:
Trooper Justin Parker, Garland County Sheriff's Department, Investigator Yoak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClina v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01159
Plaintiff:
Scotty McClina
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Oliver v. United States
as 22-3273
Petitioner / Appellant:
James Scott Oliver, also known as Scottie
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
