Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Stine v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Katie Lynn Stine and Lind
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Stine v. Does
as 4:2022cv00784
Plaintiff:
Shyda Stine
Defendant:
Does Officers, Yell County Jail, Does Officers, Guard Haley, Guard Andrew, Yell County Jail and Elkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2020cv01508
Plaintiff:
Bill Hoover, Richard Sivley, Pernecia Hull and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alcanter et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2019cv02902
Plaintiff:
DAMON GIALOURIS, UDO HARTTUNG, LONNIE CAMPBELL and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hampton v. Stine et al
as 5:2019cv05036
Defendant:
Mayor Penn, Chief Hubbard, Officer Stine and others
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hampton v. Stine et al
as 5:2019cv05012
Defendant:
Mayor Penn, Chief Hubbard and Officer Stine
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 0:2017cv02530
Plaintiff:
Elroy Rogers
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Minnesota Board of Animal Health, Diane Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
English v. Methodist Healthcare System et al
as 8:2016cv00427
Defendant:
PA Sean Bigler, ESIS AGL South Central Hub, Kelly Hemam and others
Plaintiff:
Lawan J. English
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stine Seed Company v. A & W Agribusiness, LLC, et al
as 16-1137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stine Seed Company
Defendant - Appellee:
A & W Agribusiness, LLC, James R. Williams and C. Daniel Alexander
Mikeal Stine v. U.S. Marshal Justice Prisoner, et al
as 15-3710
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Marshal Justice Prisoner Air Transport Division, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
