Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Dallas Hilt v. Clay County Sheriff's Department, et al
as 24-2054
Plaintiff:
Dallas Cody Hilt
Defendant:
Clay County Sheriff's Department, Phillips, Desk Sgt., Clay County Sheriff's Department, Teale, Deputy, Clay County Sheriff's Department and others
Hilt v. Clay County Sheriff Dept et al
as 4:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Dallas Cody Hilt
Defendant:
Clay County Sheriff Dept, Phillips, Teale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. White County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brady Watson
Defendant:
White County Sheriff's Department, RPS Inmate Roster, Ty McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teal v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv00590
Defendant:
Aearo Holding LLC, Aearo Intermediate LLC, Aearo Technologies LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Teal
United States v. KT Burgee
as 19-3034
Defendant / Appellant:
KT Burgee, also known as Kape Teal Burgee
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Welander et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02264
Plaintiff:
Stephen Wagasky, Jason Tyger, Ryan Ward and others
Defendant:
Aero Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Hurley et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2019cv02066
Plaintiff:
William Payne, Brandon Gregory, Steven Attig and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv03155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Shields v. Lambert et al
as 4:2016cv01295
Plaintiff:
James Lee Shields
Defendant:
Christopher Lambert, Karen Teal, Steven Gifford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelledy v. Kendrick et al
as 4:2015cv00675
Plaintiff:
Jackie Ray Shelledy
Defendant:
Kevin Kendrick, John Teale, Paul Vescovo, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
