Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Human v. Call Trader, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00843
Plaintiff:
Daniel Human
Defendant:
Call Trader, LLC doing business as TheHealthScout.com, Brook Whitmore, Shivani Gupta and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Whitmore v. Yetman et al
as 4:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Zachary Charles Whitmore
Defendant:
Deputy Matthew Yetman, Deputy Eric Erchein, Jailor John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad v. Conley et al
as 4:2021cv00491
Defendant:
Cook, Peacock, Seamster and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Perry Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitmore v. Ryles et al
as 4:2020cv01255
Defendant:
John Randall, Christopher Reidmiller, Tim Ryles and others
Plaintiff:
Louis W Whitmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiley v. Austin et al
as 8:2020cv00220
Defendant:
Mike Eppman, Austin, James C. and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Wiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv05013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv05009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Abernathy et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02167
Plaintiff:
Dell Webb, Vincent Beasley, Milton D. Buell and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
William Foster v. Mr. Whitmore, et al
as 19-1503
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services and Ronda J. Pash
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Wintworth Foster
Defendant / Appellee:
Mr. Whitmore, Dentist
Foster v. Corizon Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv06122
Defendant:
Ronda J. Pash, Corizon Medical Services, Inc. and Mr. Whitmore
Plaintiff:
William Wintworth Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
