Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Melton v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv00152
Defendant:
Straight Talk, Best Buy, Marysville Waste Management and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth David Melton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02428
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Taha A. Ramadan v. The State of California et al
as 2:2019cv00265
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, inclusive, California Credits Group, LLC, The State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Taha A. Ramadan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02311
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Garmong v. Lyon County, Nevada et al
as 3:2017cv00701
Defendant:
Michael P Boudreau, Epic Wireless, Andrew Lesa and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory O Garmong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mo'i Kapu v. Attorney General of the State, et al
as 17-17310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MO'I KAPU, AKA John Eleu Freeman Santos, AKA Jon Santos
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF HAWAII, Corporate STATE OF HAWAI'I ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE, Doug Chin, STATE OF HAWAII, Corporate State of Hawai'i, Sheriff Division, Nolan Espinda, BUREAU OF CONVEYANCES, State of Hawaii and others
Garmong v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency et al
as 3:2017cv00444
Defendant:
Shelly Aldean, Jim Baetge, Marsha Berkbigler and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Gregory Garmong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rogers v. Verizon Wireless Corp.
as 1:2016cv00658
Plaintiff:
Clifton Jerome Rogers
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv04418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
