Cases 101 - 110 of 128
Realty Investment Company et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 1:2012cv00314
Plaintiff:
Realty Investment Company , Realty Investment Company, LLLP , Harvey Neef and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William S Schumacher v. Amazon.Com LLC et al
as 8:2011cv01906
Defendant:
Amazon Fulfillment Service Inc, Amazon.Com LLC and Does
Plaintiff:
William S Schumacher
Navas v. Byron et al
as 3:2011cv00868
Defendant:
Anna Marie Byron, Alicia Delgado, Richard A. Gammick and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Navas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Wells v. Cashill et al
as 2:2011cv00069
Plaintiff:
Gloria Wells
Defendant:
Jim Cashill, Gallatin County Sheriff's Department, State of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Procongps, Inc. v. Star Sensor Technology, LLC., et al.,
as 3:2011cv03975
Plaintiff:
Procongps, Inc.
Defendant:
Jim Schumacher, Tony Rangel, Skypatroll, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Wessel et al v. US Dept of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management
as 6:2011cv00033
Plaintiff:
Katy Wessel and John Mehan
Defendant:
Lewis & Clark County , LaDonna M. Schumacher, Leon M. Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Pierre Mitelmann v. Schumacher Cargo Logistics Inc et al
as 2:2011cv05375
Defendant:
Boomer LLC, Does, Schumacher Cargo Logistics Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Pierre Mitelmann
Oper v. Schumacher et al
as 4:2011cv00341
Plaintiff:
Richard J Oper
Defendant:
William Schumacher, Beth Ford and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Unick et al v. Prescott Valley, Town of et al
as 3:2011cv08010
Plaintiff:
Joseph R Unick and Linda J Unick
Defendant:
Prescott Valley, Town of , Ivan Legler , Colleen Auer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
