Cases 11 - 20 of 65
O'Brien Watters & Davis, LLP v. Hanover Insurance Company
as 4:2021cv06006
Plaintiff:
O'Brien Watters & Davis, LLP
Defendant:
Hanover Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Watters v. Superior Court of California For The County of San Mateo
as 4:2021cv05601
Plaintiff:
Andrew G. Watters
Defendant:
Superior Court of California For The County of San Mateo, Superior Court of the state of California for the County of San Mateo and Leland Davis, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Moret v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2021cv00477
Defendant:
Channing Bennett, State of Oregon, James Egan and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Moret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Worthen v. Watters
as 4:2019cv00548
Defendant:
Caitlin Day Watters
Plaintiff:
James Worthen, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horob v. Watters et al
as 1:2019cv00096
Defendant:
Susan P. Watters, Dana L. Christensen and Brian Morris
Plaintiff:
Todd Kenneth Horob
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watters et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv02376
Plaintiff:
Randall E. Watters and Lisa Watters
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watters v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2019cv05016
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Nala Watters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Research and Results Engineering et al v. UCC Manufacturing et al
as 8:2018cv01848
Plaintiff:
Research and Results Engineering and Roger Watters
Defendant:
UCC Manufacturing and Jim Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Research and Results Engineering et al v. UCC Manufacturing et al
as 8:2018cv01840
Plaintiff:
Research and Results Engineering and Roger Watters
Defendant:
UCC Manufacturing and Jim Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
