Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Janet E. Carpenter et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2020cv11810
Plaintiff: Janet E. Carpenter, Tanya D. Hardin, Brian H. Carpenter and others
Defendant: Gardner Denver, Inc., Spirax Sarco, Inc., Carver Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Polly Gastrom v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv10464
Plaintiff: Polly Gastrom and Suzzane Nesbit
Defendant: Vigor Industrial LLC, 3M Company, Occidental Chemical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Speck v. 3M Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv05845
Defendant: VIGOR INDUSTRIAL LLC (individually and as successor-in-interest to TODD SHIPYARD CORPORATION), 3M COMPANY f/k/a MINNESOTA MINING, MetalClad Insulation LLC and others
Plaintiff: John Speck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Behrmann v. ABB Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv05685
Defendant: Schneider Electric USA Inc, Keenan Properties Inc, Meriden Molded Plastics Inc and others
Plaintiff: Behrmann H Ronald, Aldrich Pump LLC and Ronald H Behrmann
Not Classified By Court: Lockheed Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Connie Dietrich v. The Boeing Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56409
Defendant: SOCO WEST, INC., Brenntag West, Inc. f/k/a SOCO-Lynch Corporation successor in interest to Western Chemical and Manufacturing, Co., WESTERN AUTO SUPPLY COMPANY, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., individually and as successor in interest to Owens-Illinois Glass Company and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: CONNIE DIETRICH, an individual
Defendant / Appellant: THE BOEING COMPANY, improperly denominated as The Boeing Company, individually and as successor by merger to McDonnell Douglas Corporation, successor by merger with Dougla Aircraft Company
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant: DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff: Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner: National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Bradford Budd et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv06420
Plaintiff: Bradford Budd and Ramona Budd
Petitioner: Foster Wheeler, LLC
Defendant: Southern California Edison Company, C.W. Driver, Inc., Torrance Refining Company LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Douglas Wilber, et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, et al
as 2:2019cv04940
Plaintiff: FAITH WILBUR, DOUGLAS WILBUR, Faith Wilber and others
Defendant: Vigor Shipyards, Inc., AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC.), Elliott Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Connie Dietrich v. Autozone West, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv04291
Defendant: Autozone West, Inc., The Boeing Company, Borgwarner Morse TEC LLC as Successor-By-Merger to Borg-Warner Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Dietrich Connie and Connie Dietrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Houston v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00157
Defendant: Foster Wheeler, LLC, The Boeing Company, Owens-Illinois, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Sherrie Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?