Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Eddy et al v. Federal Home Loan Morgage Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv00400
Plaintiff:
Mark Eddy and Bobbie Eddy
Defendant:
Federal Home Loan Morgage Corporation , Bank of America N.A. and Michael M. Baker
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Cottman et al v. Naskrent et al
as 2:2017cv02045
Plaintiff:
Robert P Cottman , Michael A Baker and Daniel L Theobald
Defendant:
David G Naskrent , Matthew J Surma , Corrina Surma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baker v. Shartle
as 4:2017cv00221
Petitioner:
Michael Paul Baker
Respondent:
John T Shartle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Macdonald v. Critical Thinking Co. et al
as 6:2016cv01665
Defendant:
Michael O. Baker, Critical Thinking Co., Jamie Meyers and others
Plaintiff:
William Craig Macdonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Baker v. Warner et al
as 3:2015cv05298
Plaintiff:
David Michael Aaron Baker
Defendant:
Bernard Edward Warner and Jeffery A Uttecht
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Macdonald v. Baker et al
as 6:2014cv01633
Defendant:
Brad Avakian, Michael O. Baker, Paula M. Bechtold and others
Plaintiff:
William Craig Macdonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Michael Baker v. R. Nazir, et al
as 14-55598
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
R. NAZIR, OKAZAKI, FAREED AHMAD and others
Michael B Baker v. Bank of America, NA et al
as 2:2014cv02333
Plaintiff:
Michael B Baker
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA and Does
McBride et al v. Fannie Mae et al
as 2:2014cv00776
Plaintiff:
Danny McBride and Pamela McBride
Defendant:
Fannie Mae, Onewest Bank FSB, Financial Freedom Senior Funding Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamali v. Low et al
as 2:2013cv01054
Plaintiff:
Imran Ahmad Jamali
Defendant:
Stephanie Danica Low, William Moore, Michael W Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
