Cases 21 - 30 of 339
(PS) Gigena v. Rye et al
as 2:2023cv01662
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gigena
Defendant:
Stephen B. Rye and Brad Pope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leon v. Sherwood et al
as 2:2023cv01231
Plaintiff:
Luis Alfonso Leon
Defendant:
Sherwood, D Quinto, Pope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyd v. Martin et al
as 2:2023cv01082
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Christopher Boyd and Brinkley
Defendant:
David Martin, Boycheken, Mattshid Sarrami and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aasylei Loggervale, et al v. County of Alameda, et al
as 23-15985
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AASYLEI LOGGERVALE, AASYLEI HARDGE-LOGGERVALE and AAOTTAE LOGGERVALE
Defendant / Appellant:
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STEVEN HOLLAND and MONICA POPE
Hodges v. Marangi et al
as 3:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
Steven Bradley Hodges
Defendant:
Marangi, Justin Pope, Willian Quanga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pope v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv05090
Plaintiff:
Michael Pope
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pope v. Comenity Bank
as 3:2023cv01006
Plaintiff:
Marvin Pope
Defendant:
Comenity Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pope v. AllianceOne Receivables Management, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00930
Plaintiff:
Marvin Pope
Defendant:
AllianceOne Receivables Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Wallace v. Victor's Landscaping Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv00809
Plaintiff:
Bryan Wallace
Defendant:
Victor's Landscaping Incorporated and Michael Victor Pope
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stiles v. Kahn et al
as 3:2023cv00577
Plaintiff:
Steven Foster Stiles
Defendant:
Caroline Zapp Kahn, Clark Mathew Stiles, Amity Girt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
