Cases 21 - 30 of 115
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00215
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01315
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Knutson v. Watson
as 3:2020cv01230
Respondent:
Warden Watson
Petitioner:
Robin Lee Knutson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Knutson v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv02500
Defendant:
PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC, eLiquitech, Inc., James Monsees and others
Plaintiff:
Taggard Knutson and Taggart Knutson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Julienne Dechristofaro et al v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 2:2019cv03629
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Imerys Talc America, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Marlene Knutson, Reina D. Mackenzie, Julienne Dechristofaro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Brandt Engineers Group Limited v. Roberts et al
as 2:2019cv00231
Defendant:
Unknown Knutson, Roberts Resorts Limited, OJD Engineering LP and others
Plaintiff:
Brandt Engineers Group Limited and Brandt Engineers Group Limited doing business as Brandt Engineers
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Knutson v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv02722
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Stevie Lynn Knutson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Robin Knutson
as 18-35618
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBIN LEE KNUTSON
Knutson v. Suttell & Hammer PS et al
as 2:2018cv00101
Defendant:
Suttell & Hammer PS and Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Plaintiff:
Darlene Knutson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Knutson v. The County of Alameda et al
as 3:2017cv05692
Plaintiff:
Ronald Knutson
Defendant:
The County of Alameda and Santa Clara County Body of Politic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
