Cases 31 - 40 of 55
White v. Drobny et al
as 2:2012cv01352
Plaintiff:
Darrell Anthony White, Jr.
Defendant:
K Drobny, C Crewse, A Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Thomas C. Nelson
as 12-80048
Respondent:
In re: THOMAS C. NELSON, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: March 4, 1982
Pierce v. Hawks et al
as 2:2011cv03392
Plaintiff:
Aaron James Pierce
Defendant:
J. Hawks, A. Braida, T. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kavin Rhodes v. USDC-CAFR
as 11-73843
:
In re: KAVIN M. RHODES
Petitioner:
KAVIN MAURICE RHODES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
M. ROBINSON, R&R OFFICER, RON BLEVINS and others
Harris v. Coyote Ridge Corrections Center et al
as 2:2011cv05144
Plaintiff:
Daprei DW Harris
Defendant:
Coyote Ridge Corrections Center, Jeffrey C Nelson and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kavin Rhodes v. M. Robinson, et al
as 11-17161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAVIN MAURICE RHODES
Defendant - Appellee:
M. ROBINSON, RON BLEVINS, SARA MALONE and others
Nelson v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2011cv00846
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Cooper v. Federal, State and Local Corpora Ficta Employees et al
as 2:2011ms00056
Defendant:
1983; Camden Easterling, Mark Astle, Steven C. Babcock and others
Plaintiff:
Love Thomas Wright Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper v. Federal, State and Local Corpora Ficta Employees et al
as 2:2011cv00949
Defendant:
1983; Camden Easterling, Mark Astle, Steven C. Babcock and others
Plaintiff:
Love Thomas Wright Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv05317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
