Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Smith v. Inventure Foods Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv04256
Plaintiff:
Ian Smith
Defendant:
Inventure Foods Incorporated, Terry E McDaniel, Macon Bryce Edmonson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Entler v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2017cv05407
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Entler
Defendant:
Roy Gonzalez and Belinda D Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinley Jr. v. Frentz et al
as 3:2017cv00243
Plaintiff:
Donnie Ray McKinley Jr.
Defendant:
R. Frentz, R. Young, D. Paschal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv05697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Brooks v. Davis et al
as 5:2016cv04039
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Brooks
Defendant:
Ronald Davis, M. Voong, C. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Entler v. Joenne McGerr, et al
as 13-36116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN THOMAS ENTLER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOENNE MCGERR, Program Manager and BELINDA D. STEWART, Corrections Program Administrator
Entler v. McGerr et al
as 2:2013cv05098
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Entler
Defendant:
Joenne McGerr and Belinda D Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Stewart et al
as 3:2013cv02912
Plaintiff:
James Robert Scott
Defendant:
D. Stewart, P. Smith, L. Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D. Armstrong, et al v. Chevy Chase Bank, FSB, et al
as 12-17471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
D. STEWART ARMSTRONG and CINDY IKEOKA
Defendant - Appellee:
CHEVY CHASE BANK, FSB, CAPITAL ONE, N.A., as successor by merger with Chevy Chase Bank, FSB, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SERVICE, INC. and others
Kountze et al v. Kountze et al
as 4:2012cv05079
Petitioner:
Edward Kountze, Jean Bolden, Marlena Kountze and others
Respondent:
Charles Denman Kountze, James Mitchell, Michael Trafficante and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
