Cases 41 - 50 of 290
David Matthew Read v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv00932
Petitioner:
David Matthew Read
Respondent:
United States of America
In Re:
Return of Property
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Barcus et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv08359
Plaintiff:
Tajammal Hayat, Artis Francies, Heidi DeSesa and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Glover v. Deer Ridge Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2019cv01602
Defendant:
Assistant Director Michael Gower, Mr. Read, Mr. Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Darin A. Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv07373
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Libel,Assault,Slander
Read v. Bonner County Idaho
as 2:2019cv00285
Plaintiff:
Brandy Read
Defendant:
Bonner County Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Read v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv00235
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Diane Read
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Read v. Grant County et al
as 2:2019cv00220
Defendant:
Mike Crowder, Tom Jones, Robert Udell and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Matthew Read
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wayne Spindler v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 19-55665
Defendant / Appellee:
HUGO S. ROSSITTER, in his individual and official capacity as employee of the Los Angeles City Attorneys Office, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, HERMAN J. WESSON, Jr., in his individual and official capacity as President of the Los Angles City Council and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE SPINDLER
(PC) Lionel Lamar Shell v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2019cv00788
Plaintiff:
Lionel Lamar Shell
Defendant:
M. Holloway, J. Read and W.J. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cadena v. Frisk, et al
as 3:2019cv02684
Plaintiff:
Victor Cadena
Defendant:
J. Frisk, D. Mitchen, C. Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
