Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Brundage v. Butler et al
as 3:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
Aramis Brundage
Defendant:
Rex L. Butler, Amy Elizabeth Miller and Andrew Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brundage v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01670
Plaintiff:
Gary Earl Brundage
Defendant:
Matthew Johnson, Darren Cox and Church Of Jesus Christ Of Latter-Day Saints
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bozzini et al v. Ferguson Enterprises LLC et al
as 3:2022cv05667
Plaintiff:
Tera Bozzini and Adrian Gonzales
Defendant:
Ferguson Enterprises LLC, RETIREMENT PLAN COMMITTEE OF FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, LLC 401(K) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN, Brundage William and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Brundage v. Houser
as 3:2021cv00231
Petitioner:
Aramis Brundage
Respondent:
Earl Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grove v. SACE Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv02253
Defendant:
Timothy L. Williams, SACE Inc., Shayne Olsen and others
Plaintiff:
David Grove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01730
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Farmers Insurance Exchange et al v. Pelaez et al
as 3:2016mc00652
Defendant:
Theodore Brundage, Kenneth S. Eiler, Maria Nancy Pelaez and others
Plaintiff:
Farmers Insurance Company of Oregon and Farmers Insurance Exchange
Debtor:
Gary Seide and Laura Seide
Brundage v. State of Washington
as 3:2010cv05718
Petitioner:
James Joseph Brundage
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Marshall v. Eduardo Ferriol, et al
as 09-17270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID SHARPE MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
EDUARDO M. FERRIOL, Doctor, J E. THOMAS, R. HAZELWOOD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
