Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Barber v. Gutierrez
as 3:2020cv06817
Plaintiff:
James E. Barber
Defendant:
J. Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ditech Financial LLC, et al v. Paradise Springs One Homeowner, et al
as 18-16406
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, FKA Green Tree Servicing, LLC and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
PARADISE SPRINGS ONE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, AKA Paradise Springs One
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT C. WANG and ANNABEL E. BARBER
Ditech Financial LLC, et al v. Paradise Springs One Homeowners Association, et al
as 2:2016cv02900
Defendant:
Annabel E. Barber, Nevada Association Services, Inc., Paradise Springs One Homeowners Association and others
Plaintiff:
Ditech Financial LLC and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lukashin v. City of Olympia et al
as 3:2016cv05207
Plaintiff:
Igor Lukashin
Defendant:
City of Olympia , William D Sampson , Annaliese Harksen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv05961
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barber v. MCreary et al
as 1:2011cv00011
Plaintiff:
James E. Barber
Defendant:
MCreary, Shirley Hawkins, Corcoran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Multnomah County Sheriff et al
as 3:2010cv01121
Petitioner:
James E. Barber, Jr.
Respondent:
Multnomah County Sheriff and Whitman County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barber, et al v. Modavox, Inc., et al
as 2:2008cv01896
Plaintiff:
John E Barber, John E Barber, Samuel Barnes and others
Defendant:
Robert D Arkin and Modavox, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barber v. Humphries et al
as 3:2008cv00551
Petitioner:
Richard E. Barber
Respondent:
Stephanie Humphries and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
