Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Developers Surety and Indemnity Company v. Michael Gentry Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01860
Plaintiff:
Developers Surety and Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Michael Gentry Construction, Inc., Sara E. Clark and Michael Gentry Construction, Inc. an Oregon corporation doing business as Gentry Construction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Benjamin Freeman v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16667
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN FREEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Director at ADOCRR, J MACADOREY, Complex Warden, D QUINTERO, Deputy Warden at Cibola, Yuma and others
Freeman v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01373
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Freeman
Defendant:
David Shinn, J Macadorey, D Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valdez #275108 v. Shinn et al
as 3:2021cv08269
Plaintiff:
Ysidro Juan Valdez
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Hennry, Vanessa Headstream and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicholson et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2020cv08751
Plaintiff:
Bobby Cobb, Alvin Lemuel Monroe, Marian S. Carrillo and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephen E. Clark v. People of the State of California et al
as 2:2020cv09936
Respondent:
People of the State of California and R. Johnson
Petitioner:
Stephen E. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00239
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
(PC) Sepeda v. Clark
as 1:2020cv00838
Plaintiff:
Tony Sepeda
Defendant:
E Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Sepeda v. Clark
as 2:2020cv01171
Plaintiff:
Tony Sepeda
Defendant:
E Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Clark v. Eaton et al
as 2:2020cv01159
Defendant:
T. Wamble, Patrick Eaton and S. Gates
Plaintiff:
Ernest E Clark, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
