Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Goldfinger et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2020cv04043
Plaintiff:
Douglas Alston, Noe Farias, Jr., Katherine Coleman and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv01845
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Armstrong
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Threats v. Beard
as 3:2015cv02284
Plaintiff:
Derlyn Ray Threats
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Michael D. Stainer, Martin Hosnino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00921
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Assenberg et al v. County of Whitman et al
as 2:2014cv00145
Plaintiff:
Michael Adam Assenberg , Carla Assenberg and David J Armstrong
Defendant:
County of Whitman , Whitman County Sheriffs Department , Brett Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Alan Ness, et al v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 12-16635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALAN NESS, ALMA TOWNSEND, MAURICE BASHEER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, BENJAMIN G. DIEHL, JAMES TOMA and others
Richard Bradford v. El Monte Superior Court, et al
as 12-56293
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD O'NEIL BRADFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
EL MONTE SUPERIOR COURT, P. J. TURNER, Appellate Judge, official capacity, J. ARMSTRONG, Appellate Judge, official capacity and others
Richard O Bradford v. El Monte Superior Court et al
as 2:2012cv04504
Defendant:
Appellate Judge J Armstrong, El Monte Superior Court, J Mosk and others
Plaintiff:
Richard O. Bradford
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
