Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Allard et al v. Bonneville Power Administration, et al
as 6:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Kevin Allard, Vicki Allard, trustee of Allard Family Trust Dated May 8, 2013 and others
Defendant:
Joyce Marie Mills, Bonneville Power Administration, Eugene Water & Electric Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Curtis v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00490
Plaintiff:
James J. Curtis, Jr.
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
James Curtis v. Jeff Porter
as 20-35690
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD CURTIS
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF D. PORTER, in individual and official capacity
Curtis v. Porter
as 4:2019cv05056
Plaintiff:
James Edward Curtis
Defendant:
Jeff D Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. AKAL Security Incorporated
as 2:2018cv01117
Plaintiff:
Roy Smith , Juan J Aguilar , Curtis Baughman and others
Defendant:
AKAL Security Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Curtis v. Leathers et al
as 2:2017cv00474
Plaintiff:
James Edward Curtis
Defendant:
Leathers and Washington Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ehringer v. State of California et al
as 2:2016cv01961
Plaintiff:
Orion S. Ehringer
Defendant:
State of California, Sierra County, Charles H. Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Leon v. Janet Dunlop, et al
as 13-17650
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. LEON
Defendant - Appellee:
JANET R. DUNLOP, WILLIAM A. DORSEY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Bernstein et al v. Dunlop et al
as 3:2013cv01563
Plaintiff:
John L. Bernstein, Mary Helen Bernstein, Michael A. Leon and others
Defendant:
Janet Dunlop, William A. Dorsey, U.S. Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curtis v. Riley et al
as 3:2012cv05629
Plaintiff:
James Edward Curtis
Defendant:
William E Riley and Clark Lee Stuhr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
