Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Martinez v. Gutierrez et al
as 4:2023cv00540
Plaintiff:
Gabriel A Martinez
Defendant:
Jose Gutierrez and Arizona Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyner v. Gutierrez
as 3:2023cv05758
Plaintiff:
Dequan Tyner
Defendant:
Officer Jose Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jose Gutierrez v. Scala Inc.
as 2:2023cv08124
Plaintiff:
Jose Gutierrez
Defendant:
Scala, Inc. and Scala Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
(HC) Gutierrez v. Warden, FCI-Mendota
as 1:2023cv00359
Petitioner:
Jose Gutierrez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI-Mendota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jose Gutierrez et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 8:2022cv01264
Plaintiff:
Jose Gutierrez and Isabel Gutierrez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35474
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Guerrero Sorto v. Garland
as 22-908
Petitioner:
YOSELYN MILIZETH GUERRERO SORTO, JESUS EDGARDO GUTIERREZ GUERRERO, KEVIN JOSE GUTIERREZ GUERRERO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv05148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Jose Gutierrez v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2021cv08223
Plaintiff:
Jose Gutierrez
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Deputy Eugene Contreras, Deputy Eric Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
