Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Pressler v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2020cv00674
Defendant:
James Mathes, Elko, City of, Steven Spring and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Allen Pressler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pressler v. Elko County, Nevada et al
as 3:2020cv00670
Defendant:
James Mathes, Elko, City of, Steven Spring and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Allen Pressler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pressler v. Nevada Department of Public Safety et al
as 3:2019cv00494
Defendant:
Ben Reed, Jr., A. Carrol, D. Fisher and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Allen Pressler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leopona, Inc. et al v. UK Cycling Events, Ltd. et al
as 2:2017cv01765
Plaintiff:
Leopona, Inc. , Don't Be A Lout Music, LLC , Lionheart Media, LLC and others
Defendant:
UK Cycling Events, Ltd. , Gareth Roelofse and Jon Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Alcantara et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv01987
Plaintiff:
Nicole Alcantara , Kristin Baker , Nicole Baldwin and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation , Bayer HealthCare LLC , Bayer Essure Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mathes v. Pennymac Corp.
as 3:2017cv00439
Plaintiff:
Jack L. Mathes
Defendant:
Pennymac Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Boyd v. Tiffnay et al
as 2:2014cv01469
Plaintiff:
Nikci Boyd
Defendant:
Mathes, Miko, Techinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch et al v. Math-U-See, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00402
Plaintiff:
Susan Lynch and Dan Sinclair
Defendant:
Math-U-See, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Singapore Math, Inc. v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company
as 3:2012cv01583
Defendant:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company
Plaintiff:
Singapore Math, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
