Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Hasher v. City of Rochester et al
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Nathanial James Hasher
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Officer Edward Fritz, Officer Faudskar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roe et al v. 23andMe, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02319
Plaintiff:
Richard Roe and John Q. Public
Defendant:
23andMe, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
M. G. E., Jr. v. Los Angeles Dodgers, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv09373
Plaintiff:
M. G. E., Jr.
Defendant:
Los Angeles Dodgers, LLC, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Chief MICHEL MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nathanial Hasher v. City of Rochester, et al
as 23-35576
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIAL JAMES HASHER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF ROCHESTER, a Minnesota municipal entity, E. FRITZ, Officer, Badge No. 187, personally, individually, and in his capacity as a Rochester Police Officer, FAUDSKAR, Officer, personally, individually, and in his capacity as a Rochester Police and others
Roe v. Bright et al
as 2:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Richard Roe
Defendant:
Carolynn Bright and Does 1-9
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hasher v. City of Rochester et al
as 2:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Nathanial James Hasher
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Officer E Fritz, Officer Faudskar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Briggs v. Bright et al
as 2:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Richard Roe and Kevin Briggs
Defendant:
Carolynn Bright and Does 1-9
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Youngblood et al
as 1:2023at00130
Plaintiff:
Alain Deveroux and Jennifer Valle
Defendant:
Donny Youngblood, County of Kern, Kern County Hospital Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roe v. The City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv01193
Plaintiff:
Richard Roe
Defendant:
The City of Portland, Ariel Livingston, John Does I-III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
