Cases 1 - 8 of 8
State of Washington et al v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al
as 1:2023cv03026
Plaintiff:
State of Washington, State of Oregon, State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
United States Food and Drug Administration, Robert M Califf, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
State of Idaho, State of Iowa, State of Montana and others
Amicus Curiae:
Legal Voice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association and others
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
The United States v. State of Idaho
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
The United States and United States of America
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Intervenor Defendant:
Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives Scott Bedke, Idaho Senate President Pro Tempore Chuck Winder, and the Sixty-Sixth Idaho Legislature
Amicus Curiae:
New York, State of, California, State of, Connecticut, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
State of Oregon, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-35386
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, PLANNED PARENTHOOD COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DIANE FOLEY, OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae:
SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, SOCIETY FOR ADOLESCENT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, AND SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE and others
State of Washington v. Azar et al
as 1:2019cv03040
Plaintiff:
State of Washington, Deborah Oyer, National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M Azar, II, Diane Foley and others
Amicus Curiae:
American College of Physicians, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, State of Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
American Medical Association et al v. Azar et al
as 6:2019cv00318
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, United States Department of Health & Human Services, Office of Population Affairs and others
Plaintiff:
American Medical Association, Michele P. Megregian, C.N.M., Thomas N. Ewing, M.D. and others
Amicus Curiae:
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Physicians, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California v. Azar et al
as 3:2019cv01184
Defendant:
Alex Azar, Health and Human Services, Secretary and U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Plaintiff:
State of California Attorney General's Office and State of California
Petitioner:
Essential Access Health, Inc., Chris Sevier and Dr. Melissa Marshall, M.D.
Amicus Curiae:
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Physicians, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Oregon et al v. Azar et al
as 6:2019cv00317
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, Diane Foley, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Oregon Medical Association, Planned Parenthood of Southwestern Oregon, American Medical Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, City of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Essential Access Health, Inc. et al v. Azar II et al
as 3:2019cv01195
Plaintiff:
Essential Access Health, Inc. and Melissa Marshall, M.D.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Alex M. Azar II
Amicus Curiae:
American College of Physicians, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
