Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Doe v. Tradeshift, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Tradeshift, Inc., Tradeshift Holdings, Inc., Morten Sondergaard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Spalding v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08211
Plaintiff:
Wayne H Spalding
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carolyn Tracie Love v. Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2023cv03851
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Tracie Love
Defendant:
Los Angeles County, Department of the Coroner, Los Angeles City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Gregory Brown v. Richard Morgan, et al
as 22-35884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY TYREE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD L. MORGAN, BERNARD WARNER, SCOTT FRAKES and others
Kristina Spalding v. FCA US LLC
as 5:2022cv00532
Plaintiff:
Kristina Spalding
Defendant:
FCA US LLC and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
St John v. Las Palmas Homeowners Assoc.
as 2:2021cv02028
Plaintiff:
Dyana A. St John
Defendant:
Las Palmas Homeowners Assoc., CDM Management, HOA Attorney Gregory P Kerr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
(PC) Richard v. Joseph et al
as 2:2021cv00975
Plaintiff:
Craig Richard
Defendant:
Joseph and Spalding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kohen Uhuru v. B. Velasquez, et al
as 21-15239
Defendant / Appellee:
R. NORIEGA, B. VELASQUEZ, LAURA ELDRIDGE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KOHEN DIALLO UHURU, AKA Priest
(PC) Uhuru v. Velasquez et al
as 2:2020cv01267
Defendant:
B. Velasquez, R. Noriega, J. Spalding and others
Plaintiff:
Kohen Diallo Uhuru and Kohen Diallo E. Uhuru
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ustick v. Osborne et al
as 4:2020cv03787
Defendant:
Deanna Osborne, Consolidated Wealth Management, Ltd., Scott Spalding and others
Plaintiff:
Delia Ustick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
