Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00791
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
A.I.I.L. et al v. Sessions et al
as 4:2019cv00481
Defendant:
L Francis Cissna, Alex Azar, Matthew Albence and others
Plaintiff:
J.L.V.A., A.I.I.L., L.L.H.O. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller v. Pfizer Inc.
as 3:2019cv03783
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Plaintiff:
Stephen Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
George M. Medak v. Department of Homeland Securities
as 5:2018cv00302
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Securities, Mark Stephen Miller and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Plaintiff:
Medak M George
Stephen Miller v. Citibank, N.A.
as 2:2017cv05310
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. and Does
Plaintiff:
Stephen Miller
Stephen Miller v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2013cv05148
Plaintiff:
Stephen Miller
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Carmen Trutanich, William W Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
-OP The Humane Society of the United States v. Hallmark Meat Packing Company et al
as 5:2008cv00221
Cross Defendant:
Cattleman's Choice, Inc., M & M Management, LLC, Anthony Magidow and others
Unknown:
James J Gallagher and James J Gallagher
213) 622-2690 (fax:
Mark R Troy and Mark R Troy
Defendant:
Cattleman's Choice, Inc., Does, Donald R. Hallmark and others
Cross Claimant:
Donald R. Hallmark, Donald W. Hallmark and Hallmark Meat Packing Company
Intervenor Defendant:
M & M Management, LLC and Walter S. Weiss
Plaintiff:
The Humane Society of the United States States
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Miller v. Kettle Falls International Railway
as 2:2008cv00377
Plaintiff:
Stephen Miller
Defendant:
Kettle Falls International Railway
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
