Cases 1 - 10 of 1,639
Dickson v. Goldman Sachs Bank USA
as 3:2024cv01070
Plaintiff:
Andrea Dickson
Defendant:
Goldman Sachs Bank USA
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv14121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Indiana Public Retirement System v. Agilon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02506
Plaintiff:
Indiana Public Retirement System
Defendant:
agilon health, inc., Steven J. Sell, Timothy S. Bensley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Indiana Public Retirement System v. Agilon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Indiana Public Retirement System
Defendant:
Agilon Health, Inc., Steven J. Sell, Timothy S. Bensley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
