Cases 31 - 40 of 3,681
Mackey v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2024cv11969
Defendant:
Harvard University, State of Texas, ESA P Portfolio Operating Lessee LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
AGIS Software Development LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00602
Defendant:
AT&T Communications LLC, AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC and others
Plaintiff:
AGIS Software Development LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
T-Mobile US v. KAIFI
as 24-40491
Plaintiff:
T-Mobile US Incorporated and T-Mobile USA, Incorporated
Defendant:
KAIFI, L.L.C.
Allen v. Cellco Partnership, et al.
as 24-4573
Defendant:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, doing business as AT&T Mobility, DISH WIRELESS LLC, CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, doing business as Verizon Wireless and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY ALLEN
Hornthal v. Snowflake, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00068
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc., Snowflake, Inc. and AT&T Mobility, LLC
Plaintiff:
David Hornthal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
David Sifuentes, III v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 24-1617
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANGEL SIFUENTES, III
Defendant:
AT&T MOBILITY, LLC
Lita v. American Express Co. et al
as 2:2024cv05216
Defendant:
American Express Co., T-Mobile US, Inc., Altice USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeton Lita
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Young v. AT&T Mobility, LLC et al
as GAN/1:24-cv-03185
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC and AT&T Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lori Young
Interested Party:
Mary Loechel Sanford
Young v. AT&T Mobility, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03185
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC and AT&T Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lori Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
