Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Donald v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Angela Donald
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, John Crow and Gwendolyn Babers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Ramey v. Fair et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Abraham Ramey
Defendant:
Officer Fair and John Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv00600
Plaintiff:
Angela Wells
Defendant:
Thomas Jones, Jennifer McCovery, Danarris Lovejoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Currington v. Crow et al (INMATE 4)
as 1:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
DeAndre D. Currington
Defendant:
John Crow, Steven T. Marshall, State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tarrance v. Crow et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
Quindarrius Tarrance
Defendant:
John Crow, Steven T. Marshall and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walter v. Crow et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Adam Eugene Walter
Defendant:
John Crow, Matthew Stone and Lt. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Crow (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00732
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Nicholas Burke
Defendant:
John Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacoby v. McCoy et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00723
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy, Ms. Bibb, NP Ferrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Crow et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00557
Plaintiff:
Daniel MacArthur Wilson
Defendant:
John Crow, Monica McCoy, George Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Johnson & Johnson et al (MAG+)
as 2:2021mc03947
Plaintiff:
San Diego County Employees Retirement Association and Frank Hall
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Alex Gorsky, Dominic J. Caruso and others
Petitioner:
Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles P.C. and Ted Meadows
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
