Cases 31 - 40 of 430
Whitley v. Yates
as 2:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Marco D Whitley, Sr
Defendant:
John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hart v. Watlington et al
as 2:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hart, Sr
Defendant:
Tommy Watlington and John Marlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Stinson v. Yates et al
as 2:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Mark T Stinson, Sr
Defendant:
John P Yates, Blair, Rendon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Moore v. Proctor et al
as 4:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Moore, Sr
Defendant:
Willard Proctor, Jr, Paul Worthy, Brimley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
U-Haul Co of Arizona Inc et al v. Clark et al
as 2:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
U-Haul Co of Arizona Inc and U-Haul Co of Georgia Inc
Defendant:
Andre Clark, Markus Carpenter, James Holmes, Sr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Singleton v. West Memphis Police Department
as 2:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Elijah Jartavius Singleton, Sr
Defendant:
West Memphis Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Razulu v. Seamster et al
as 4:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Shaka Rushdee Razulu
Defendant:
Lonnell Oquin Seamster, Sr, Tina M Evans, Brenda L Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Pulaski County Detention Center
as 4:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Dana Lamon Smith, Sr
Defendant:
Pulaski County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Does
as 2:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson, Sr
Defendant:
Does Unknown BOP Medical Staff, FCI Forrest City, AR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
