Cases 1 - 10 of 308
Campbell v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv01560
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Johnathon C. Campbell
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Shurtz v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv01218
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Rayce L. Shurtz
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Cathcart v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv00540
Plaintiff:
Constance Cathcart
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Fink v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv00827
Plaintiff:
Chris Fink
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Brown v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv01564
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Todd Brown
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Vann v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv01414
Plaintiff:
Mary Vann
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Kiderlen v. Berryill
as 4:2019cv01049
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Robert Kiderlen
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gonzalez v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv01429
Plaintiff:
Shannon M. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Fogle v. Berryhill
as 2:2019cv00039
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Fogle
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Allport v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv01396
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Keith Allport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
