Cases 1 - 10 of 135
BRITT v. GREGG et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY DESEIRAY BRITT
Defendant:
KATHRYN LEBAUBE GREGG, CHRISTOPHER BAILEY, GREGORY BOONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FREEMAN et al v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY FREEMAN and C. B.
Defendant:
MARBELY SANCHEZ, GREGORY J. SEABOLT and CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOLCIM (US) INC. v. PYRTLE et al
as 1:2023cv01019
Plaintiff:
HOLCIM (US) INC.
Defendant:
GREGORY K. PYRTLE, PYRTLE VENTURES LLC and CARSON INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
WOOD v. WELLPATH, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
DAVID RYAN WOOD
Defendant:
WELLPATH, LLC, THE COUNTY OF ROWAN, J. TRAVIS ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIDES v. KIMBROUGH et al
as 1:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SIDES
Defendant:
BOBBY KIMBROUGH, JOHN DOE CORPORATION, COUNTY OF FORSYTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GAUSE v. GEOFF et al
as 1:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
WALTER T. GAUSE
Defendant:
GREGORY GEOFF, FNU - SHAW, MORRISON LEACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. AUSTIN et al
as 1:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
WILMA KAY DAVIS
Defendant:
KEVIN AUSTIN, J. GREGORY MATTHEWS, VALARIE ZACHARY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
CIARCIELLO v. BIOVENTUS INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Robert Ciarciello
Defendant:
Bioventus Inc, Kenneth M Reali, Mark L Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
HALL v. USA
as 1:2023cv00024
Petitioner:
GREGORY DEVON HALL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
