Cases 11 - 20 of 107
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CLE REQUIREMENTS . . .
as 1:2015mc00049
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Respondent:
MICHELE RENE IGNEY, GARY LEE ROYER, HOLLY DEMAREST WARSHAUER and others
Annis v. Rule
as 22-1259
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Willis Boyd Annis, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Mike Rule, Operations, Human Trafficker, Actor, Andrew Rule, Satellite Card Manufacturer, Actor, Lesslie Rule, Owner Operator, Communications and others
United States v. Jalen Jackson-Bundy
as 22-2477
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jalen Keevon Jackson-Bundy
Ables et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00758
Plaintiff:
Ables, Steven Ables, Zechariah Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Annis v. Rule et al
as 2:2022cv00057
Defendant:
Olivia Sherels, Mike Rule, Andrew Rule and others
Plaintiff:
Willis Boyd Annis, III
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Addison et al v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 4:2021cv09187
Plaintiff:
Angela Addison, Charlene Alewel, Kim Anderson and others
Defendant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
US v. Sean Bundy
as 22-6004
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SEAN RONDELL BUNDY, a/k/a Bun Rock, a/k/a Humps
Addison et al v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 4:2021mc09187
Plaintiff:
Angela Addison, Charlene Alewel, Kim Anderson and others
Defendant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
EVERAGE et al v. BUNNING et al
as 3:2021cv00082
Defendant:
TIM SHORT, DAVID L BUNNING, VONCIL THACKER and others
Plaintiff:
EVERAGE REAL ESTATE INC, MARY JOE BUNDY EVERAGE, MARY JOE EVERAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
US v. Sean Bundy
as 21-7141
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SEAN RONDELL BUNDY, a/k/a Bun Rock, a/k/a Humps
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
