Cases 21 - 30 of 2,358
Highland Employee Retention Assets LLC v. Dondero et al
as 3:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Highland Employee Retention Assets LLC
Defendant:
James Dondero, Mark Okada, Mark Katz and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Salem v. Burns et al
as 1:2024cv21509
Plaintiff:
Skylar Salem
Defendant:
William Burns, Chicago Police, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Saintillus v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2493
Plaintiff:
CHALONER SAINTILLUS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PHILLIP A. TALBERT, GRANT RABENN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Daniel Grant v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03141
Plaintiff:
Daniel Grant
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lawrence v. Daseke, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Daseke, Inc., Chuck Serianni, Jonathan Shepko and others
G & G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Grant et al
as 1:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Defendant:
Ricardo Grant and Cinema OTR LLC doing business as Cinema
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC v. Beattie et al
as 0:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC doing business as Running Aces
Defendant:
Michael Beattie, Craig Beaulieu, Raymond Brenny and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BRAXTON-GRANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. USA
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
BRAXTON-GRANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
FORD v. MERCER et al
as 2:2024cv04894
Defendant:
TINGO GROUP, INC., DARREN MERCER, HAO CHEN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
