Cases 31 - 40 of 21,061
Smith v. Superior Court of California County of Alameda et al
as 3:2024cv01981
Plaintiff:
Andrea Smith
Defendant:
Superior Court of California County of Alameda, People of the State of California, Judge Stuart Hing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ALIEV et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01495
Plaintiff:
MURAT MAGOMEDOVICH ALIEV, BONUM CAPITAL (CYPRUS) LTD, LIMTED LIABILITY COMPANY BONUM CAPITAL and others
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, JANET YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Indiana Public Retirement System v. Agilon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Indiana Public Retirement System
Defendant:
Agilon Health, Inc., Steven J. Sell, Timothy S. Bensley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Indiana Public Retirement System v. Agilon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02506
Plaintiff:
Indiana Public Retirement System
Defendant:
agilon health, inc., Steven J. Sell, Timothy S. Bensley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
John A. Mansour v. Morgan Stanley et al
as 4:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
John A. Mansour
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Nichiren Smith
as 24-11541
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
NICHIREN SHOSHU SMITH
Salazar et al v. United Sugar Producers & Refiners Cooperative et al
as 0:2024cv01847
Defendant:
United Sugar Producers & Refiners Cooperative, United Sugars Corporation, American Sugar Refining, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Salazar, Liana Britt, Kimberly Rybarczyk and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
