Cases 1 - 10 of 367
Polk v. Wing-Heier
as 3:2024cv00207
Defendant:
Lori Wing-Heier
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Polk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gilbert-Daniels v. Lions Gate Entertainment, Inc., et al.
as 24-4936
Defendant:
LIZ GARCIA, CHERNIN ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, PATRIK IAN POLK and others
Plaintiff:
NICOLE GILBERT-DANIELS
Polk County v. 3M Company et al
as FLM/8:24-cv-01475
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Raytheon Technologies Corporation, f/k/a United Technologies Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Polk County
Polk v. Texas Department of Insurance et al
as 4:2024cv02198
Defendant:
Texas Insurance Commissioner and Texas Department of Insurance
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Polk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Iowa Migrant Movement for Justice et al v. Bird et al
as 4:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Iowa Migrant Movement for Justice, Jane Doe and Elizabeth Roe
Defendant:
Iowa Attorney General, Clayton County Attorney, Polk County Attorney and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Immigration Lawyers Association and Immigration Reform Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2403 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Delgado v. Raspberry et al
as 9:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Maria Delgado
Defendant:
Shelly Sitton, Tom Brown, Polk, County of and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Delgado v. Raspberry et al
as 2:2024cv11088
Plaintiff:
Maria Delgado
Defendant:
Sarah Raspberry, Jamie Richardson, Shelly Sitton and others
Polk v. The State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Polk
Defendant:
The State of Nevada, The Supreme Court of the State of Nevada, The Nevada Board of Bar Examiners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Cardwell v. Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
as 24-606
Plaintiff:
KALOMA CARDWELL
Defendant:
DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP, THOMAS REID, JOHN BICK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
