Cases 1 - 10 of 975
Radke v. Luger et al
as 0:2024cv02616
Defendant:
Andrew M. Luger, Merrick B. Garland and Civil Process Clerk
Plaintiff:
Timothy Allen Radke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
1925 Hooper LLC et al v. Arc Realty LLC
as 2:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
1925 Hooper LLC, Robert J Arko and Andrew M Moore
Defendant:
Arc Realty LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
1925 Hooper LLC et al v. Watson Realty Corp. et al
as 3:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
1925 Hooper LLC, Robert J. Arko, Andrew M. Moore and others
Defendant:
Watson Realty Corp., Premiere Plus Realty Co., Charles Rutenberg Realty, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
El v. Chun
as 24-1142
Defendant:
BLAIR, JOSEPH FUCITO, Sergeant PETER LITRA, Shield #1197 and others
Plaintiff:
SAGE EL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Tripathy v. Schneider
as 24-560
Plaintiff:
SANJAY TRIPATHY
Defendant:
ANDREA N. SCHNEIDER, Acting Superintendent Gowanda CF, D. LOCKWOOD, Acting Deputy Superintendent of Security, Gowanda CF, M.D. JOHN MORLEY, Deputy Commissioner & Chief Medical Officer, DOCCS, Albany, NY and others
Roy v. Russell et al
as 1:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Anand Roy
Defendant:
Mark A. Russell, Michael Lohscheller, Stephen J. Girsky and others
John Castro v. Andrew Warner
as 24-1040
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY CASTRO
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF STATE ANDREW M. WARNER and DONALD J. TRUMP
Intervenor:
WEST VIRGINIA REPUBLICAN PARTY and STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
USA v. Andrew Berkowitz
as 24-1140
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW M. BERKOWITZ
Disame v. Kantharia
as 24-151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW M. DISAME
Defendant / Appellee:
BHARAT K. KANTHARIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
