Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Ham-Pena v. Garland
as 24-1287
Petitioner:
CARLOS ALBERTO HAM-PENA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
BLACK et al v. JAMES et al
as 1:2024cv00128
Defendant:
SOOMI JAMES, SUMI JAMES-BLACK, SUMI JAMES BLACK and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL P. BLACK, III, SAMUEL P. BLACK & ASSOCIATES D/B/A BLACK INSURANCE GROUP doing business as BLACK INSURANCE GROUP, ERIE MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Carralero, et al. v. Bonta
as 23-4354
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARCO ANTONIO CARRALERO, GARRISON HAM, MICHAEL SCHWARTZ and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California
Virani et al v. Bafna et al
as 0:2023cv62110
Defendant:
Kaif Hamid, Priyank Bafna, BP Watches and Electronics Co LTD and others
Plaintiff:
Adnan Virani, Junaid Hammed, World of Space LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04040
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfers Act
United States of America v. Harmon (Everett)
as 23-6374
Defendant:
VON HARMON and Ham
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ARTHUR EVERETT
Knife Rights, Inc. et al v. Bonta et al
as 3:2023cv00474
Plaintiff:
Knife Rights, Inc., Eliot Kaagan, Jim Miller and others
Defendant:
Rob Bonta, Kelly Martinez and Summer Stephan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
US v. John Ham, Jr.
as 23-6076
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN FORREST HAM, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
