Cases 11 - 20 of 9,000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jeffrey Damon Younger v. Anne Georgulas et al
as 2:2024cv04428
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY DAMON YOUNGER
Defendant:
ANNE GEORGULAS and MARY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Burgess v. State of Hawaii Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
John Timothy Burgess
Defendant:
State of Hawaii Department of Human Services, Jessica Wong Sumida, Hawaiian Airlines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones et al v. Nielsen et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Kalie Jones and Nicholas Stephen Hulse
Defendant:
Judge Douglas Nielsen, Moody John R., Cleave Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anne Heiting v. Extra Space Storage Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04243
Plaintiff:
Anne Heiting
Defendant:
Extra Space Storage Inc. and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Serrant v. Enqi Real & all constituents et al
as 2:2024cv11351
Plaintiff:
Crystal Serrant
Defendant:
Enqi Real & all constituents, Ann M. Tobin-Levigne, Ann M. Tobin-Levigne P.C. and others
Washington et al v. City of St. Ann et al
as 4:2024cv00715
Plaintiff:
Warren Washington
Defendant:
City of St. Ann, Amy Poelker, Officer Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nieto v. B. et al
as 1:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Ann Nieto
Defendant:
Diane B., Sherrie B. and Jerrallyn B.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
